Daniel Khazime vs Sergey Petrov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 02:09 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Khazime vs S. Petrov

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Khazime 1 - 0 Petrov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniel Khazime winning 2 and Sergey Petrov winning 1. The last match between Daniel Khazime and Sergey Petrov was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Daniel Khazime getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Khazime | 1 |
| Petrov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(10-22-25)
D. Khazime vs S. Petrov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.04% (51-47) | Career Total W/L | 60.71% (17-11) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Khazime vs S. Petrov Match Preview:
- Recent form indicates Daniel Khazime is stronger on second serve, winning 47.37% of points compared to Sergey Petrov's 41.18%.
- Which player is better at returning second serves? Daniel Khazime has the edge, taking 50.23% of his opponents' second serves, compared to Sergey's 42.11%.
- Sergey Petrov is slightly better at returning first serves, with 33.33% compared to Daniel Khazime's 31.01%.
- Under pressure, Daniel Khazime saves break points at 50.00%, outperforming Sergey's 28.57%.
- Both players have similar overall match win percentages, with Sergey at 57.14% and Daniel at 55.17% over the past year.
- When we consider their best surfaces, both players excel on Hard courts with a 57% win rate.
- How does the quality of opponents compare? Sergey has faced tougher competition with an average rank of 28.86, whereas Daniel faced opponents averaging rank 185.31.
- In deciding sets, Daniel Khazime holds a slight advantage with a 43% win rate compared to Sergey's 40%.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance trends indicates Daniel Khazime appears to hold a moderate advantage over Sergey Petrov. His superior second serve and return statistics provide a noteworthy edge, particularly when points are critical.
While Sergey Petrov has demonstrated a modestly higher performance level against tougher opponents, the factor of under-pressure breakpoint saves further tilts the balance in Daniel's favor. This strength is crucial in high-stakes moments.
Both competitors are equally adept on Hard courts; however, Daniel's ability to handle pressure and his slightly higher success in deciding sets suggest he may be better equipped for crucial match situations.
Ultimately, Daniel Khazime's consistency on second serve and ability to capitalize on opponent weaknesses make him the favorite to win in this upcoming match.
Daniel Khazime vs Sergey Petrov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Khazime vs S. Petrov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 12 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:49:34 | Average Match Time | 1:49:34 |
| 61% (60/98) | 1st Serve % | 53% (46/87) |
| 73% (44/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (28/46) |
| 53% (20/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 40% (35/87) | Return Points Win % | 35% (34/98) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Khazime Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 5-7 16-14 | ||
S. Petrov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 5-3 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||

D. Khazime vs S. Petrov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.04% (51/47) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.71% (17/11) |
| 50.67% (113/110) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.66% (37/24) |
| 51.23% (1102/1049) | Games Win/Loss | 54.18% (324/274) |
| 55.81% (48/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.71% (17/11) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 222 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 276 | Total Double Faults | 36 |
| 1:26:38 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 70.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 92.54 |
| 63% (3451/5505) | 1st Serve % | 56% (282/504) |
| 65% (2237/3451) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (187/282) |
| 47% (972/2054) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (114/222) |
| 42% (248/585) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (21/53) |
| 41% (2253/5433) | Return Points Win % | 39% (221/573) |
| 52.04% (51/47) | Futures W/L | 60.71% (17/11) |
| 53% (51/97) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (16/26) |
| 50% (11/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 61% (17/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 90% (48/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (16/15) |
| 10% (48/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (16/1) |
| 16% (50/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (12/2) |